According to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) interim order, Indian seed companies that use global agriculture firm Monsanto's technology will not need to destroy Bt cotton seeds, patent lines and germ plasm once their contract ends. The domestic companies had filed an anti-competition case against Monsanto for the inclusion of such causes in the license agreement these have with the global giant.
If the seeds, parent-lines and germ plasm, containing the technology of Monsanto are destroyed according to the post-termination obligations, it may not be possible for the Indian seed companies to restore the same at a later point of time. Thus, such destruction would cause irreparable and irretrievable harm to the latter and needs to be prevented, said CCI in its order.
This order would be applicable only after it is approved by the Delhi High Court. However, the CCI prevented the Indian companies from selling any seeds manufactured using Monsanto technology after November 30, 2015. The companies have also been asked to keep a proper record of these seeds. As per Article 9 of the sub-license agreements with Monsanto, whenever the agreement is terminated, the Indian seed companies have to immediately cease selling or distributing the seeds, destroy all the seeds, destroy the parent lines or other cotton germ plasm.
Earlier, Monsanto had terminated the sub-license agreements with three Indian companies - Nuziveedu Seeds, Prabhat Agri Biotech and Pravardhan Seeds - on 14 November last year. After filing an anti-competition complaint on 15 December last year, the Indian seed companies moved an application on 22 December asking interim relief.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
The New Rules of Resale: EPR turning secondhand into fashion’s strategic growth …
The global fashion industry is facing a decisive regulatory and commercial reset. What began as a sustainability narrative around reuse... Read more
The 2027 Mandate: Why denim’s future hinges on verifiable data
For decades, the global denim industry has relied on a narrative of durability, heritage, and authenticity. That narrative is now... Read more
Europe’s textile core unravels as costs, imports and policy pressure bite
Europe’s textile and apparel sector, long seen as a benchmark for craftsmanship and industrial depth, is slipping into a prolonged... Read more
Automation, innovation, regulation are the forces shaping textiles in 2026
The global textile sector has entered a new era. Early 2026 saw the industry breach a $1.06 trillion valuation, reflecting... Read more
The new Brussels rulebook, every EU apparel order is now a balance-sheet risk
The humble export order sheet is undergoing a transformation. What was once a straightforward commercial instrument: SKU, volume, FOB price,... Read more
Why 2026-27 could be a defining cotton year for India’s farm-to-fashion economy
The global cotton economy is entering a more constrained phase, and for India, the implications run far beyond the farm... Read more
Luxury resale’s next big battle is no longer digital, it is about who controls s…
For nearly a decade, the luxury resale story was written in the language of platforms. Market leadership was measured by... Read more
Digital Arms Race: Indian apparel giants deploy AI to neutralize tariff crisis
The Indian textile and apparel sector is in a digital survival phase in 2026, shifting from traditional labor-intensive models to... Read more
Europe’s Textile Endgame: Why Project FAE is becoming fashion’s most critical in…
Europe’s apparel majors are no longer treating circularity as a branding layer. With Project FAE or Feedstock Activation Europe, the... Read more
Engineering color at source, dye-free production is cutting cost, water, and tim…
For over a century, coloring has been anchored in wet processing, an energy-intensive, chemically saturated stage that happen post spinning.... Read more












