The 2017 Trade Policy Agenda unveiled by the Trump administration indicates that it is not going to be easy for India to do business with the Trump regime. The serious troubles lie ahead on trade and investment fronts. This document ominously states that the US will come down on India’s export subsidy programmes, and push for a stricter regime for intellectual property rights and patents. The Trump team’s first report — 2017 Trade Policy Agenda and 2016 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program — released by the Office of the United States Trade Representative categorically states that India’s “import restricting measures” result in “serious market access issues” for the US industry. The document sees a general trend of tariff increases in India, which reflects an active pursuit of import substitution policies. The March 2 document states that the US will engage India bilaterally to commit to a phase-out of its export The report also states that India’s trade and regulatory policies have “inhibited” the real growth potential of the bilateral trade that rose to $109 billion in 2015 from $4.8 billion in 1980. The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, it says, could provide an impetus to the creation of a “common internal market that significantly lowers transaction costs.” While agreeing that India’s reforms on IPR are encouraging, the document says India’s new National Intellectual Property Rights Policy should protect US innovations. As per sources, the US will “come down heavily” on India and other countries with which it has trade surplus. The US has registered its biggest monthly trade deficit in nearly five years of $48.5 billion.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Redefining what responsible production looks like
India's textile and apparel sector has set the global benchmark for sustainability at scale, and two clusters are leading the... Read more
China’s duty-free revival meets a reality check as Hainan shifts from VICs to va…
Hainan’s retail recovery is beginning to look less like a cyclical rebound and more like a rewiring of China’s domestic... Read more
Zombie inventory and shrinking margins inside China’s fashion returns meltdown
China’s digital fashion market, long celebrated as the world’s most sophisticated test bed for e-commerce innovation, is facing a destabilising... Read more
Circularity by Design: How EU rules are turning data into fashion’s new currency
The European fashion sector has entered a compressed transition window. Two regulatory confirmations: the revised EU Textile Labelling Regulation (effective... Read more
The Lyst Reset: Chanel and Dior rewrite luxury’s power index
The global luxury hierarchy has been quietly rewritten, and not by sales alone. In Q1 2026, Chanel rose to the... Read more
Inventory, not expansion, defines winners in global apparel
The 2025 fiscal year has crystallised that revenue growth and operational health are no longer moving in tandem. In an... Read more
From growth-at-all-costs to cash discipline, the new economics of DTC fashion
The global direct-to-consumer apparel market is entering a correction phase, as fashion brands across the US, Europe and the UK... Read more
Britain’s Forgotten Growth Engine: Why policy gaps are undermining fashion and t…
Britain’s fashion and textile industry, often framed through the lens of creativity and design, is emerging as a case study... Read more
Beyond price rallies structural reform can strengthen India’s cotton economy
India’s cotton economy is entering a decisive phase, where firmer prices and tighter arrivals in the 2026-27 season have given... Read more
Polyester volatility redraws India’s textile industry competitive map across Asi…
India’s synthetic textile industry has entered a phase of cost instability as polyester staple fibre (PSF) prices rise across domestic... Read more












