FW
Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA) has nominated Mohammad Hatem as its new President for the 2025–27 term. The association has also elected Fazle Shamim Ehsan as its new Executive Vice President.
These new directors were designated at the association’s headquarters in Narayanganj. The association received a total of nine nomination forms for nine leadership positions, including President, Executive President, Senior Vice President, Vice President (Finance), and five Vice Presidents.
The final list of candidates was published after a review of these submissions. As all nominees were unopposed, each was elected without contest.
The five newly elected Vice Presidents include Md Samsuzzaman, Gowher Siraj Jamil (representing Chattogram), Ashiqur Rahman, Fakir Kamruzzaman Nahid, and Mohammad Rashed.
The burgeoning trade relationship between India and Bangladesh has hit a turbulent patch, marked by a series of retaliatory trade restrictions that threaten to disrupt established supply chains, inflate costs, and potentially undermine regional economic integration. Following Bangladesh's imposition of curbs on Indian yarn exports via land, India has responded with stringent port restrictions on a wide range of imports from its eastern neighbor, most notably ready-made garments (RMG), a cornerstone of Bangladesh's export economy.
The directive issued by India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) on May 17, 2025, mandates that all RMG imports from Bangladesh must now enter India through the distant seaports of Nhava Sheva (Mumbai) and Kolkata, effectively closing the previously efficient and cost-effective land routes. This measure extends to several other commodities, including fruits, processed food items, cotton yarn waste, certain plastic and PVC goods, and wooden furniture, which will no longer be permitted through Land Customs Stations (LCSs) and Integrated Check Posts (ICPs) in key border regions. Essential goods like fish, LPG, edible oil, and crushed stone remain exempt from these restrictions.
Bangladeshi Exporters Brace for Impact: Higher costs and delays loom
Bangladeshi exporters are voicing significant concerns over the implications of these restrictions. The shift from a 2-3 day transit time via land to the potentially weeks-long sea journey, coupled with increased handling and port charges, is expected to substantially inflate logistics costs. This will erode the competitive edge that Bangladeshi apparel manufacturers currently enjoy in the Indian market.
A former director of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) emphasized that the extended lead times and higher expenses would inevitably lead to a decrease in overall export volumes to India. He cautioned that such protectionist measures, especially in the current global economic climate, would inflict further damage on trade between the two nations.
India's Rationale: Addressing trade imbalances and protecting domestic industry
The Indian government justifies its actions as a necessary response to what it perceives as unfair trade practices by Bangladesh. Dhaka's earlier restrictions on Indian yarn exports via land routes had already disrupted the supply chain for Indian manufacturers. Sources within the Indian government point to the significant duty-free access granted to Bangladeshi apparel (over ₹6000 crore annually, approximately $800 million USD) while highlighting barriers faced by Indian exporters.
"This measure was essential to address the growing imbalance in our trade with Bangladesh, where we were witnessing a surge in duty-free apparel imports while our own textile exports faced hurdles," stated an official at AEPC. "While we value our trade relationship with Bangladesh, it must be based on principles of reciprocity and fairness. These restrictions will provide a level playing field for our domestic garment manufacturers and encourage self-reliance."
Santosh Katariya, President CMAI, stated, “CMAI welcomes the Government’s decision to restrict garment imports from Bangladesh through land ports. This move addresses the industry’s long-standing concern regarding the unchecked inflow of low-cost apparel into the Indian retail market, which was adversely impacting domestic manufacturers, particularly MSMEs. The decision is a timely step towards preventing the dumping of foreign-made garments and strengthening India’s self-reliance in apparel production." Katariya also emphasized the need for complementary measures, adding, "At the same time, we believe this policy must be complemented with continued support for capacity building and ease of doing business for Indian manufacturers. Enhancing the competitiveness of our MSMEs is critical to fully harness the opportunities created by such progressive trade measures.”
However, this perspective is not universally shared within the Indian industry. Sanjay K Jain, Chair of the ICC National Textiles Committee, cautions against escalating trade tensions. "We need to tread very carefully as being neighbours," he stated. "We enjoy a very close and sensitive relationship with each other. One measure by one country is leading to a countermeasure by another country and that is countered again which makes the rift deeper and deeper and takes us more and more away from free trade as smooth flow of goods based on necessity and requirement between both countries is very important." Jain emphasized the need for de-escalation, suggesting, "both sides need to discuss in one meeting & unwind measures taken by both sides. Yarn and garment restrictions on both sides need to be undone immediately to build confidence."
Furthermore, India aims to curb the alleged "backdoor entry" of Chinese fabrics into its market. These fabrics, reportedly imported duty-free into Bangladesh, were then processed into garments and exported duty-free to India, circumventing Indian import duties on Chinese textiles (20%). The new restrictions, by increasing the cost and complexity of this route, are intended to plug this loophole.
The move also aligns with India's "Atmanirbhar Bharat" (Self-Reliant India) initiative, aiming to boost domestic manufacturing. By making imports from Bangladesh more expensive and time-consuming, the government hopes to incentivize Indian retailers to source more from local producers. Estimates suggest that ₹1000-2000 crore (approximately $133 - $267 million USD) worth of apparel imports from Bangladesh could be replaced by Indian-made goods.
The Cost Advantage Conundrum: A double-edged sword for India
However, the effectiveness of India's retaliatory measures is complicated by the fundamental cost advantages held by Bangladeshi apparel manufacturers, as highlighted in previous reports. Lower labor costs, subsidized power, duty-free access to Chinese fabrics, and export incentives provide Bangladeshi producers with a significant 10-15% price edge. This makes it challenging for Indian retailers to readily switch to domestic suppliers without impacting their profit margins or increasing prices for consumers.
Impact on Stakeholders: A mixed bag of consequences
|
Stakeholder |
Potential Impact |
|
Bangladeshi Exporters |
Increased logistics costs, longer transit times, potential decrease in export volumes to India, erosion of competitive advantage. |
|
Indian Retailers |
Supply chain disruptions, potential increase in sourcing costs, difficulty in finding cost-competitive domestic alternatives, potential pressure to raise consumer prices. |
|
Indian Manufacturers |
Potential increase in demand, opportunity to capture a larger share of the domestic market, but may face challenges in scaling up production and matching the price competitiveness of Bangladeshi imports in the short term. |
|
Indian Consumers |
Potential for higher prices on apparel, possible reduction in the availability of certain product categories in the short term due to supply chain adjustments. |
|
Regional Trade |
Increased friction in bilateral trade, potential for a negative impact on overall regional economic integration and cooperation, erosion of trust between trading partners. |
|
Logistics Sector (India) |
Increased business for seaports (Nhava Sheva, Kolkata) and related transportation services, but potential strain on port infrastructure and increased congestion. |
Case Studies: Ground-Level disruptions
● Indian Apparel Importers in Tirupur: Many small and medium-sized apparel importers in textile hubs like Tirupur rely on the quick turnaround and lower costs associated with land-based imports from Bangladesh, particularly for stock lots and fast-fashion items. These businesses now face significantly higher transportation costs and longer lead times, potentially impacting their profitability and competitiveness against larger players with established sea-based supply chains.
● Cross-Border Manufacturing Units: Several Indian textile companies had established manufacturing units in Bangladesh to capitalize on the lower production costs and duty-free export access to India. These units now face uncertainty regarding their supply chain logistics and may need to re-evaluate their operational strategies in light of the increased costs associated with sea-based imports into India.
Navigating a Thorny Path Forward
The current trade impasse underscores the complexities of managing bilateral economic relationships, especially when significant cost differentials exist. While India's concerns regarding trade imbalances and the need to protect its domestic industry are valid, the retaliatory measures risk creating significant disruptions and potentially harming Indian consumers and retailers.
Experts suggest that a more constructive approach would involve open dialogue and negotiation between the two nations to address the underlying issues. This could include exploring ways to enhance the competitiveness of the Indian textile sector, streamlining customs procedures, and fostering greater transparency in trade practices. Unilateral retaliatory measures, while providing a short-term response, may ultimately prove counterproductive in the long run, potentially damaging the trust and cooperation that underpin regional trade and economic growth. The focus should shift towards finding mutually beneficial solutions that promote fair trade and sustainable economic development for both India and Bangladesh.
Apparel Group, a leading fashion and lifestyle retail conglomerate, has unveiled Koton’s reimagined concept store at Dubai Mall, marking a strategic milestone in the brand’s expansion across the Gulf region. Situated on the first floor of one of the world’s top shopping destinations, the store introduces an elevated retail identity focused on women’s and teen fashion.
The refreshed concept reflects Koton’s global brand evolution and Apparel Group’s commitment to strengthening international partnerships. Featuring a modern layout, immersive visual merchandising, and trend-led seasonal collections, the store is tailored to the tastes of the UAE’s dynamic fashion consumers.
Neeraj Teckchandani, CEO of Apparel Group, stated, “This milestone reinforces our vision of driving global brand growth through regional excellence. The GCC retail landscape is shifting rapidly, and Koton is ideally positioned to lead in the value-driven fashion segment.”
Koton Chairman Yılmaz Yılmaz emphasized the strategic significance of the Gulf region, noting, “Dubai Mall is a prestigious location for our new concept launch. Our collaboration with Apparel Group sets a strong foundation for continued growth. We also plan to launch Koton.com in the region and open nine new stores by the end of 2025.”
Koton currently operates 18 stores across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain. Expansion plans include market entries into Kuwait, Oman, and Qatar. Globally, Koton runs 449 stores in over 70 countries, offering affordable fashion with a strong focus on sustainability and women’s empowerment.
The Dubai Mall launch underlines Apparel Group’s pivotal role in driving Koton’s growth in the Gulf’s high-potential retail sector.
India anticipates a significant rise in textile exports to the United Kingdom following the recent signing of a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the nation, said Giriraj Singh, Union Textiles Minister at Moneycontrol’s Powering Bharat Summit 2025.
The Minister stated, he expects textile exports to the UK to rise from $1.5 billion to $5 billion. However, this increase will be rapid, not gradual, he added.
He attributed the anticipated export growth to the tariff reductions outlined in the FTA, emphasizing how competitors such as Bangladesh and Vietnam had previously gained an advantage in the global textiles market by entering into similar free trade agreements.
Earlier this month, India and the UK finalized a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), representing a major trade deal between the two countries that follows a period of global trade uncertainty. The FTA eliminates the existing 12 per cent tariff on Indian textile exports to the UK. This zero-duty access is projected to substantially improve the price competitiveness of Indian goods in a key market.
The India-UK FTA signifies a significant step in their bilateral trade relationship. It is the first comprehensive agreement signed between the two nations after years of discussions and occurs at a time when India is actively working to broaden its export markets and lower tariff barriers through bilateral trade agreements.
Singh also highlighted India’s robust textile value chain. India has comprehensive, end-to-end solutions in textiles, he said, adding that the government is dedicated to meeting the clothing demands of the country’s expanding population.
Addressing concerns about competition from nations like Bangladesh and Vietnam, Singh asserted, India possesses the required infrastructure, investment support, and workforce.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ensured sufficient investment in the textile sector. There is no shortage of labor in India, he stated.
The new FTA is expected to benefit not only Indian exporters but also to stimulate employment in textile manufacturing centers across various states.
Continuing their upward trajectory, India's Textile & Apparel (T&A) exports grew by 7.45 per cent in April 2025 compared to the same month of the previous year. This positive trend was driven by the strong performance of the apparel segment, which increased by 14.43 per cent Y-o-Y during the month, as per a report by the Ministry of Commerce.
Rakesh Mehra, Chairman, Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) says, the current 14.43 per cent growth in apparel exports seems to be mainly driven by increased shipments to the United States, following the announcement of reciprocal tariff measures by the US administration.
Welcoming the signing of the India–UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Mehra says, it will provide a further impetus to India’s T&A exports by improving market access of Indian products in the UK market.
In April 2025, Indian textile exports increased by 2.61 per cent while apparel exports grew by 14.43 per cent to $ 1.37 billion mark compared with $ 1.2 billion in April last year.
Compared to the corresponding month in 2023-24, India’s T&A sector grew by 6.3 per cent in 2024-25, as per figures released by the Commerce Ministry.
GHCL Textiles has appointed Marshal Rajendra Kumar Sonavane as its new Chief Executive Officer (CEO), effective June 1, 2025. He will succeed R Balakrishnan, who has been with GHCL for over 20 years and played a key role in driving the company’s transformation and growth.
Having originally joined GHCL as Chief Strategy Officer on January 1, 2025, Marshal has now been promoted to CEO of GHCL Textiles. In his new role, he will lead the company’s strategic and operational initiatives, focusing on innovation and strengthening its position in the market.
A graduate of BITS Pilani with a degree in Mechanical Engineering, Marshal also holds an MBA in Finance and Marketing from XLRI Jamshedpur. He brings over 14 years of diverse experience across industries, known for blending strong strategic thinking with hands-on execution. His appointment signals GHCL Textiles’ commitment to long-term growth and leadership excellence.
RS Jalan, Non-Executive Director, GHCL Textiles, says, Sonavane’s extensive industry expertise and forward-looking approach are a perfect match for the company’s vision of innovation and progress. GHCL Textiles is expected to reach new milestones and continue on a path of sustainable and inclusive growth under his leadership.
Prior to joining GHCL, Marshal held leadership positions at several leading firms, including Arvind Limited, YCP Auctus, and Accenture Management Consulting.
At the upcoming edition of Apparel Sourcing Paris 2025, Myanmar Garments Manufacturers Association (MGMA) has urged its member companies to showcase ‘Made in Myanmar’ products.
To be organized by Messe Frankfurt France, Apparel Sourcing Paris 2025 will be held from September 15-17, 2025 in Paris Le Bourget, France.
One of the largest biannual events in Europe for manufacturers of clothing and accessories from emerging sourcing countries, Apparel Sourcing Paris 2025 brings together exhibitors from the fashion industry, attracting over 1,000 visitors. It is a platform to explore basic apparel to innovative products for buyers across the country.
MGMA has been participating in Apparel Sourcing Paris 2025 since 2022 with an aim to build a network with European buyers. The association has invited member companies to exhibit Made in Myanmar products at the event with a cost-sharing system. Those who wish to be present at the event need to pay registration fees for it.
Bangladesh is on track to maintain its position as the world's largest cotton importer in the MY2025-26, with imports projected to reach a record-breaking 8.5 million bales, according to a forecast from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).
Vietnam is expected to follow closely with 8 million bales, also marking an all-time high for the country, as stated in the USDA's latest ‘Cotton: World Markets and Trade’ report.
The report points to a slight recovery in global cotton consumption, anticipated to reach a five-year high of 118.1 million bales. This rebound is attributed to stable economic activity, particularly in major textile-exporting nations like Bangladesh and Vietnam.
For Bangladesh, the increase in cotton imports reflects the continued growth of its ready-made garment (RMG) industry — the cornerstone of its export economy. Mohammad Hatem, President, Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA), states, Bangladesh's decision to import more cotton from the US is part of a larger strategy to narrow the trade gap between the two countries.
He notes, the record volume of cotton imports would also strengthen Bangladesh's argument for securing duty-free access for its RMG products in the US market. The government has already taken the necessary steps in this regard, Hatem says.
He further states, US cotton is considered the best globally in terms of quality and consistency, making it the preferred choice for local spinners and manufacturers. He opines, USDA's import forecast is a strong validation of Bangladesh's ability to maintain and expand its leadership in the global apparel value chain.
Global cotton trade is also projected to increase by 2.3 million bales to 44.8 million bales in MY 2026, indicating a broader rise in demand across textile-producing economies.
Having imported 15 million bales in MY 2024, China is projected to import only 7 million bales in MY 2026. The country's reduced demand has created an opportunity for Bangladesh to rise to the top, which analysts say represents a significant structural shift in global cotton trade flows.
The USDA also anticipates stable global cotton prices, supported by adequate supply, a weakening US dollar, and declining energy costs. These trends may ease cost pressures for Bangladeshi mills, which have faced high input costs over the past two years, the association adds.
A groundbreaking new study by Glimpact, has pulled back the curtain on the often-obscured environmental footprint of the apparel industry, revealing a detailed assessment of the ecological costs associated with some leading fashion brands like, Patagonia, Reformation, H&M, Ralph Lauren, and Alo Yoga. Unlike previous analyses, Glimpact looks deep into the entire lifecycle of garments – from raw material extraction and processing to manufacturing, transportation, consumer use, and eventual disposal – offering a comprehensive picture of the industry's impact.
Beyond greenwashing and vague claims
The primary objective of the study is to move beyond generalized sustainability claims and provide, quantifiable data on the specific environmental burdens created by individual apparel brands. In an era saturated with "eco-friendly" marketing and vague commitments, Glimpact aims to inject transparency and accountability into the fashion landscape.
"For too long, consumers and even industry stakeholders have relied on incomplete or high-level assessments of environmental impact," explains Anya Sharma, lead researcher for Glimpact. "Our goal was to dissect the supply chains of major brands, identify the most significant ecological hotspots, and provide a clear, data-driven understanding of the true cost of our clothes."
The relevance of this study is paramount in a world grappling with climate change, resource depletion, and pollution. The findings offer insights for consumers seeking to make more informed choices, policymakers aiming to regulate the industry, and brands looking to implement meaningful and impactful sustainability strategies.
A holistic and granular approach
What sets Glimpact apart from many previous studies is its holistic and granular approach. The findings challenge conventional assumptions about sustainability in fashion, revealing that carbon emissions account for just 23 per cent of a typical apparels product’s environmental footprint. This underscores the limitations of solely focusing on carbon reduction strategies.
Using the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method, a science-based approach adopted by the EU to standardize environmental assessments, Glimpact evaluated over 100 apparel items across a spectrum of 16 environmental impact categories. These extend beyond climate change to include critical factors such as particulate pollution, fossil resource depletion, and water use, which together constitute over 75 per cent of an apparel product’s total environmental footprint. This multi-faceted approach provides a far more nuanced understanding of ecological costs than studies solely focused on carbon.
Glimpact moves beyond broad industry averages and focuses on specific product categories and even individual garments from leading brands. This level of granularity allows for direct comparisons and highlights the varying ecological costs associated with different materials, production methods, and supply chain complexities.
The varied impacts across brands
The study analyzed a diverse portfolio of apparel from ten prominent global brands, including Patagonia, Reformation, H&M, Ralph Lauren, and Alo Yoga, across different price points and styles. Some findings and illustrative case studies involving these specific brands have emerged.
Reformation's organic cotton paradox: The study revealed that Reformation’s Tessa Hoodie, made from 100 per cent organic cotton, had the highest environmental impact among the women’s sweatshirts tested. This impact surpassed that of Alo Yoga’s Accolade Hoodie (which makes no explicit sustainability claims) and Patagonia’s Fitz Roy Icon Uprisal Hoody, which is made from a significant amount of recycled materials but not entirely (consisting of 55 per cent recycled polyester and 45 per cent recycled cotton).
Glimpact’s analysis suggests that even with seemingly sustainable materials like organic cotton, other lifecycle stages, such as energy-intensive processing, water usage in manufacturing, and the specific chemicals employed, can significantly inflate the overall footprint. The study indicated that simply changing the source of cotton used in Reformation’s hoodie or optimizing its manufacturing processes could potentially reduce its footprint by up to 40 per cent.
The misplaced focus on packaging and distribution: A significant finding of the Glimpact study is that packaging and distribution, often primary focal points in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategies and marketing campaigns, account for less than 7 per cent of the total product environmental impact on average. This suggests that while important, these areas are dwarfed by the impact of raw material production and manufacturing. “Carbon is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Christophe Girardier, CEO, Glimpact. “Brands are pouring millions into recycled packaging and carbon offsets while ignoring the fact that 90 per cent of their impact is baked in before a single product is even sewn. If we don’t start measuring what really matters – raw material origin, dyeing, and fiber choices – we’re not solving the climate crisis, we’re greenwashing it.”
Raw materials and manufacturing intervention points: Consistently across all analyzed brands and product categories, raw materials and manufacturing contribute over 90 per cent of a product’s total environmental impact. This underscores that these stages are the most effective and crucial targets for meaningful sustainability interventions by brands like Patagonia, Reformation, H&M, Ralph Lauren, and Alo Yoga.
Material choices: Simply choosing a ‘sustainable’ material does not guarantee a low environmental impact. The case of Reformation’s organic cotton hoodie exemplifies this. The study highlights variations exist within material catergory. For example, the environmental impact of polyester can differ significantly depending on whether it is virgin or recycled, the energy sources used in its production, and the efficiency of the manufacturing processes.
Path to a more sustainable future
The study findings have implications for the analyzed brands and the entire apparel ecosystem. For consumers, it provides a more informed basis for purchasing decisions, encouraging a shift towards a deeper understanding of environmental impact that goes beyond surface-level claims and considers the full lifecycle of a garment. For policymakers, the detailed data, utilizing the standardized PEF method, can inform the development of more effective regulations and incentives that target the most environmentally damaging stages of apparel production.
For apparel brands like Patagonia, Reformation, H&M, Ralph Lauren, and Alo Yoga, Glimpact offers a clear and data-driven roadmap for identifying their most significant environmental impacts. The overwhelming contribution of raw materials and manufacturing to the overall footprint necessitates a re-evaluation of sourcing practices, material choices, and production technologies. Brands need to prioritize investments in innovative, lower-impact raw materials, cleaner and more efficient manufacturing processes, and fundamentally rethink their supply chain management to achieve meaningful and lasting reductions in their ecological cost.
The quest for sustainable and high-performance alternatives to traditional resources has sparked a revolution in fiber use. According to the Material Innovation Initiative (MII), while alternative leathers have gained traction, the broader realm of alternative fibers remains vastly untapped, holding less than a 1 per cent market share. This underscores a significant opportunity for innovation and growth, particularly in mitigating the environmental impact of materials like silk, wool, and fur, which heavily rely on animal agriculture.
Environmental imperatives of traditional fibers
Traditional production methods for materials such as wool and silk entail extensive land use, substantial water consumption, and significant greenhouse gas emissions. Notoriously water-intensive, wool production, and the ethical concerns surrounding silk farming highlight urgent environmental and ethical considerations in these sectors.
Biotechnology, pioneering sustainable solutions
Biotechnological advancements are proving to be game-changers in material innovation. Emerging processes now allow for the biofabrication of fibers, where plant-based carbon is transformed into complex proteins using microorganisms. These engineered proteins boast customizable properties, making them suitable for diverse applications ranging from textiles to automotive components.
AMSilk, leading the charge in biofabrication
AMSilk stands at the forefront of this biotechnological frontier with their innovative biofabricated silk proteins. Conducting cradle-to-gate analyses, AMSilk has demonstrated that their biotech silk production phase contributes less than 20 per cent of the overall environmental impact compared to traditional methods. This reduction is achieved through streamlined processes that minimize land and water usage, setting a new standard for sustainable material production.
Versatility and adaptability of biofabricated fibers
The versatility of biofabricated proteins is unparalleled. These materials can be precisely tailored at a molecular level to meet specific performance criteria, from lightweight applications to robust structural uses. Already, more than 50 potential cross-industry applications have been identified, showcasing the broad scope of their potential impact.
Harnessing AI and precision bio-fermentation
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and precision bio-fermentation technology is accelerating the scalability and affordability of alternative materials. AI-driven protein engineering enables the creation of proteins with enhanced performance attributes, while precision bio-fermentation facilitates large-scale production at competitive prices. These advancements are poised to disrupt up to 50% of the global materials market, with immediate applications across textiles, consumer goods, automotive, agriculture, and food packaging.
India's role in the sustainable fiber revolution
India, renowned for its rich textile heritage, is emerging as a pivotal player in the sustainable fiber revolution. With the Indian technical textiles market projected to reach $30 billion by 2027, there is a growing demand for sustainable and high-performance materials. The government has launched initiatives like the National Technical Textiles Mission, aimed at boosting the production and adoption of technical textiles, including sustainable fibers. Efforts are also underway to promote the cultivation and processing of natural fibers such as cotton, jute, and bamboo, emphasizing sustainable practices across the industry.
India's growing startup culture is spearheading innovative approaches to sustainable materials. Companies are leveraging agricultural waste to develop biodegradable textiles and packaging solutions. Notably, Ananas Anam has pioneered a leather alternative derived from pineapple leaf fibers, gaining traction among Indian enterprises committed to sustainability.
The Indian government's support for research and development in sustainable fibers is robust, with significant investments and funding directed towards advancing these technologies. Research institutes across India are actively engaged in pioneering sustainable solutions, underscoring the nation's commitment to driving environmental stewardship through innovation.
As global industries shift towards sustainability, the convergence of biotechnology, AI, and proactive governmental support is paving the way for a new era in material innovation. With India poised to play a central role in this transformative journey, the future promises a landscape where sustainable fibers not only meet but exceed global market demands, ushering in a cleaner, greener, and more resilient future.
