As against competitors like China, Vietnam and India which experience growth, Bangladesh’s RMG exports to the United States declined by 6.28 per cent Y-o-Y to $5.21 billion in Jan-Sep’24period as against $5.77 billion registered in the same period in 2023. Bangladesh’s RMG exports volumes to the US also declined by 1.49 per cent to 1.73 billion sq m during the period, shows data by the US Department of Commerce’s Office of Textiles and Apparel (OTEXA).
Despite thisdecline, Bangladesh continued to be the third-largest apparel exporter to the US, holding a 9.07 per cent market share, behind China at 21.06 per cent and Vietnam at 18.75 per cent. Notably, Vietnam's RMG exports to the US increased by 1.22 per cent to $11.21 billion, while India’s shipments grew by a modest rate of0.47 per cent to $3.63 billion. RMG exports by Cambodia and Pakistan to the US also increased by 7.09 per cent and 2.32 per cent, respectively.
Exporters cite domestic challenges such as extended lead times, inconsistent energy supplies and high operational costs as factors contributing to Bangladesh’s negative growth. Additionally, recent gas and electricity shortages have disrupted factory operations in the country, preventing them from running at full capacity. Further straining the sector, unrest and political instability have further is affecting production schedules and raising concerns about potential shifts in work orders.
A study by the US Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) indicates, diversifying their sourcing strategies, American fashion companiesareexploring emerging destinations like India. Supply chain disruptions, shipping delays, and geopolitical concerns remained top issues of concerns for US brands in 2024.
China’s apparel exports to the US also declined by 2.28 per cent to $12.50 billion. While overall US apparel imports decreased by 2.57 per cent to $59.32 billion in the first nine months of 2024, the volume of these imports rose by 2.57 per cent, with imports from China increasingby 4.06 per cent, imports from Vietnam rising by 6.66 per cent, shipments from India expanding by 9.58 per cen, imports from Cambodia increasing by 11.43 per centand those from Pakistan rising by 1.63 per cecnt from Pakistan.
Fazlul Hoque, Former President, BKMEA, notes, while global demand had been sluggish, it is starting to recover, with work orders improving despite pricing pressures. Mahmud Hasan Khan, Rising Group adds, the upcoming work-order outlook for early 2025 is positive, though pricing remains challenging. Exporters acknowledge, compounded by gas shortages and banking delays in opening back-to-back LCs, Bangladesh’s lead-time issues pose significant obstacles.
These challenges give China and Vietnam, with their efficient lead times and reliable energy supplies, a competitive edge. Exporters stressed that meeting shorter lead times is crucial for maintaining orders, which Bangladesh struggles to achieve amid its current constraints.
One of the largest vertically integrated textile (yarn, bath, bed linen) paper (wheat straw-based) and chemical manufacturers, the Trident Group increased its Profit After Tax (PAT) to Rs 84 crore in Q2, FY25 as against a PAT of Rs 73 crore in Q1, FY25 ended June’24.
The Group’s total standalone income for Q2FY25 stood at Rs 1,721 crore, while Earnings Before Interest, Depreciation, Tax, and Amortiaation (EBIDTA) increased to Rs 236 crore during the quarter.
In Q2, FY25, the Trident Group’s standalone revenue for Yarn, Home Textile and Paper & Chemical segments remained muted at Rs 902 crore, Rs 980 crore, and Rs 233 crore. respectively, while retaining margins and marginal improvement of in its margins for the Bath Linen Business.
Trident also established a wholly-owned subsidiary, titled, Trident Group Enterprises Pte during the quarter. The Group showcased its diverse product range at the prestigious NY Home Fashion Market Week in New York. With exports contributing 57 per cent of revenue, the group continues to invest heavily in enhancing production capabilities and sustainability initiatives.
Additionally, Trident Group hosted its largest 5-day retailer meet in New Delhi, attracting over 1,500 retailers during the quarter.
Winsome Textile Industries reported a robust growthinQ2, FY’24 ended Sep’24. Compared to the corresponding quarter last year, the company’s net sales increased by 8.21 per centto Rs. 219.03 croreduring the quarter as against Rs. 202.41 crore in Q2, FY23.
Its net profit grew by 104.67 per cent to Rs. 8.76 croreduring the quarter, compared to Rs. 4.28 crore in the corresponding quarter of the previous year. This substantial increase highlights Winsome Textile's robust performance and effective operational strategies.
The company’s EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation) also improved by 21.72 per cent to Rs. 27.18 crore during Q2, FY24 from Rs 22.33 crore in Q2, FY23. This growth reflects enhanced profitability and operational efficiency.
Additionally, its Earnings per share (EPS) experienced increased to Rs. 4.46 in Sep’24 quarter from Rs. 2.14 in Sep’ 23 quarter underlining the company’s strengthened earnings capacity.
Renowned UK-based luxury fashion house, Burberry has re-appointed Paul Price in the expanded role of Chief Product Merchandising and Planning Officer. Price previously held the position of Chief Merchandising Officer at Burberry from 2007-17. He will officially return to the company on Dec 9, 2024 and report directly to Joshua Schulman, CEO who took on the leadership role earlier this year.
During his initial decade-long tenure at Burberry, Price played a significant role in driving the brand’s product strategies, contributing to consistent double-digit growth and being an integral part of Burberry’s era of peak value creation. Schulman praised Price as an ‘exceptional merchant and retail leader,’ highlighting his impactful work across various markets and channels.
Following his departure from Burberry in 2017, Price served as CEO of Topshop and Topman and later moved to Los Angeles to work with James Perse. Most recently, he operated his own consulting firm, leveraging his extensive experience in the fashion and retail industry.
Expressing his excitement about rejoining Burberry, Price called the company an ‘iconic brand with an incredible legacy in British fashion and luxury.; He noted its unique cultural significance and rich history as defining qualities that distinguish Burberry from its peers.
As part of his new role, Price will become a member of Burberry’s executive committee and plans to relocate to London at the start of 2025.
A Taiwan-invested textile firm, Far Eastern Polytex Vietnam plans to launch the third-phase of its investment in a textile manufacturing facility in Binh Duong, says Yeh Ming Yuh, CEO.
Starting with an investment of $274.2 million in 2015, Far Eastern Polytex Vietnam increased its total investment in the Binh Duong facility to $1.37 billion in 2021.
Its third-phase investment of $1.54 billion was approved in December 2023, making Far Eastern Polytex Vietnam the biggest foreign investor in Binh Duong province, an industrial hub in southern Vietnam.
The facility aims to produce fiber, dye of apparel products, and super fiber for production of vehicle components (safety belts, tires, and airbags).
Foreign direct investment in Vietnam increased by 1.9 per cent Y-o-Y to $27.26 billion in the first 10 months of this year with investment in the T&A sector increasing by 8.9 per cent to $30.57 billion in Jan-Oct’24 period.
Southeast Asia’s e-commerce market is set to exceed $370 billion by 2030, more than doubling its current size, driven by major platforms such as Alibaba’s Lazada, PDD Holdings' Temu, Byte Dance’s TikTok Shop, and Sea Group’s Shopee, according to a report from Google, Temasek Holdings, and Bain & Co.
Covering six core nations, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam, the report projects a 15 per cent growth in gross merchandise value (GMV) this year, reaching $263 billion, while revenue could increase by 14 per cent to $89 billion.
Live-stream shopping, pioneered by TikTok’s Douyin, now comprises 20 per cent of e-commerce GMV, up from 5 per cent two years ago, fueling regional expansion. TikTok Shop surged to the second-largest platform with $16.3 billion in GMV last year. The report notes that sectors including e-commerce and food delivery are shifting from growth-focused strategies to profitability, achieved through optimized seller fees and targeted campaigns.
However, regulatory challenges loom as Indonesian and Vietnamese authorities scrutinize the influx of low-cost Chinese imports. Indonesia recently suspended TikTok Shop, and Temu faces licensing issues in Vietnam, highlighting ongoing tensions as local industries seek protection from international competition.
The landslide victory and return of Donald Trump to the US presidency presents both opportunities and challenges for India's textile and apparel industry, largely hinging on trade policies, tariffs, and the US-China dynamic. What does a new Trump administration mean for this sector, a look.
Trump has frequently criticized India's trade policies, labelling it the "biggest tariff charger" among US trade partners. He has proposed a policy of “reciprocity,” implying that if India continues to impose high tariffs on US goods, his administration might respond with similar tariffs on Indian exports, including textiles. However, some analysts believe this rhetoric may not lead to extreme changes, as India’s growing economic importance as a China-alternative keeps trade relations favorable.
Trump’s stance on China could indirectly benefit India's textile and apparel sectors. Trump would likely continue to impose tariffs and restrictions on Chinese goods, which could lead US companies to source textiles from alternative markets like India. During his first term, such policies prompted many US companies to explore Indian suppliers for apparel and textiles to avoid tariffs on Chinese goods. This could increase demand for Indian products and solidify India as a viable supplier to the US market.During Trump’s first term, US-China tariffs motivated American companies to look at India for alternatives in sourcing, providing a significant boost to Indian apparel and textile exports. The industry saw higher interest from US buyers, seeking non-Chinese sources to avoid tariffs and supply chain disruptions. For example, major players in India’s textiles, cotton and apparel sector saw robust exports to the US as a result of Trump’s trade policies targeting China.
Increased protectionism in the US might push companies to diversify their supply chains and invest in countries with lower production costs. India, with its large and inexpensive labor pool, could attract US FDI in textile manufacturing. While Trump’s policies focus on reshoring USmanufacturing, many companies may find it economically viable to establish supply chains in India to offset costs associated with tariffs on Chinese goods. This shift could be advantageous for Indian textiles, positioning India as a key player in global supply chains.
Trump’s preference for fossil fuels over renewable energy could result in lower oil prices, which would benefit the energy-intensive textile industry in India. Lower energy costs could reduce manufacturing expenses for Indian textiles, making them more competitive internationally. However, this shift could also limit USIndia partnerships in sustainable energy, which some textile firms have been utilizing to meet global sustainability standards.
While Trump’s return could imply certain protective measures that may challenge India’s textile and apparel exports, the indirect benefits from his anti-China stance might create opportunities for Indian companies. Additionally, reduced energy prices could lower manufacturing costs, benefiting India’s cost-competitive market position. If these dynamics play out as anticipated, India’s textile industry could see both increased exports to the US and higher FDIs, as US companies look to diversify from China. For India to maximize benefits, diplomatic negotiations will be key to minimizing potential retaliatory tariffs while leveraging the openings created by global trade shifts.
Will Trump presidency in 2024 be beneficial for the global textile and apparel industry? The answer is complex, as Trump's trade policies have historically been marked by protectionism and a focus on rebalancing trade relationships.
Trump's trade approach includes higher tariffs, especially on Chinese imports, to boost domestic manufacturing—a tactic that could disrupt the global textile supply chain. This was previously observed when tariffs on Chinese goods, including textiles, increased under his administration. This policy shift had ripple effects across Asia, with countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam adjusting their trade strategies to compensate for disruptions. However, these changes could make the US market more challenging for Asian suppliers due to higher costs and reduced competitiveness.
Under Trump, the US exited the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), reducing competition from TPP member nations for the US market, notably impacting countries like Vietnam, which were positioned to benefit significantly from the TPP. Instead, Trump favored bilateral agreements that could favor US industries, impacting global textile exporters who are dependent on the US market, such as those in Bangladesh and India. Moving forward, Trump's preference for bilateral agreements could reshape the US-textile exporter relationships, but this would be contingent on complex negotiations and potentially restrictive conditions related to labor and environmental compliance.
Trump’s ‘America First’ stance emphasizes American manufacturing, often resulting in higher production costs domestically due to labor and raw material prices. While some US brands may look for non-Chinese suppliers, the global industry would face increasing challenges. Brands would need to pass on these higher costs to consumers or absorb them, potentially slowing demand. This factor also pressures apparel brands reliant on overseas manufacturing to reconsider sourcing or absorb tariff-related costs, impacting their profitability.
As Trump's trade policy often entails scrutiny of labor conditions, textile suppliers—especially those in Asia—could face increased compliance pressure. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), for instance, required North American fibers to support regional supply chains, which could dreduce demand for materials from global suppliers. However, if countries align with higher standards for labor and sustainability, this could offer long-term benefits as brands increasingly seek ethical suppliers. Falling imports and a trade slowdown
Another likely effect is a reduction in US imports, similar to the declines seen during the last Trump administration, where total apparel imports dropped sharply. In 2024, import volume has already shown signs of a downturn, with a 23 per cent decrease compared to previous years, partly due to Trump-era trade policies creating long-lasting effects. Asian exporters may find it challenging to make up for this demand drop without favorable trade terms.
Therefore, Trump's return might stimulate US-based textile manufacturing and protect US workers, it could strain the global textile supply chain. Costs would likely increase for US brands, who may either shift sources or raise consumer prices. Additionally, suppliers in countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam could face competition, compliance pressures, and a volatile trade environment. The impact on the global textile and apparel industry would be a mixed, with higher protectionism creating opportunities domestically but posing obstacles for international partners reliant on the US market.
The U.S.-China trade tensions that escalated under the Trump administration profoundly impacted China’s textile and apparel industry. The policies implemented primarily through tariffs disrupted supply chains, forced companies to adapt sourcing strategies, and reshaped the global apparel trade landscape. Examining the long-term effects, adjustments within the industry, and the broader economic implications…an analysis below. c Impact of tariffs on trade volumes and prices
During the Trump era, U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports included up to 25% tariffs on textiles and apparel, which led to a significant reduction in U.S. imports from China. By 2022, China’s share in the U.S. apparel market dropped as companies sought lower-cost alternatives in Vietnam, Bangladesh, and other Southeast Asian countries. This shift is reflected in data showing that countries outside China increased their U.S. market share from 41.2% in 2018 to over 51% in 2022, with Chinese imports largely focused on premium segments where consumers were less sensitive to price increases. For example, items like high-end coats and outerwear continued to be sourced from China, while lower-end products were shifted elsewhere.
The tariffs pushed companies to diversify their supply chains, a strategy known as "China Plus One," which involved sourcing from China alongside one or more other countries to mitigate risks. Additionally, many U.S. companies resorted to "tariff engineering," modifying designs to achieve lower tariff classifications. For instance, adding features to a garment, such as pockets, could reduce the applicable tariff rate. However, tariff engineering and supply chain diversification require substantial investment, creating challenges particularly for small and medium-sized businesses.
In response to U.S. tariffs, China imposed retaliatory tariffs on American imports, further straining trade relations. For China’s apparel industry, which relies heavily on the U.S. market, these reciprocal tariffs intensified the need for market adaptation. Companies faced increased costs not only from the tariffs themselves but also from retooling and repositioning products for markets with less exposure to U.S. tariffs.
The tariffs impacted not only Chinese manufacturers but also U.S. retailers dependent on low-cost imports. The National Retail Federation estimated that American consumers faced billions in additional costs due to increased tariffs, ultimately affecting retail prices. Moreover, even after Trump, the Biden administration continued many of these tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations, signalling that these changes could be long-term. This uncertainty has led many U.S. brands to prioritize building resilient, diverse supply chains to avoid dependency on any single region.
A notable case study is China’s shift towards higher-end production to maintain profitability amid rising costs and tariffs. By focusing on premium products, Chinese manufacturers retained demand in sectors less impacted by price sensitivity, such as luxury and designer apparel. This transition highlights China’s evolving role, moving from low-cost mass production to higher-quality, higher-margin goods that cater to more affluent markets, helping offset some losses due to reduced volume in lower-end segments.
Trump’s policies accelerated shifts in the global apparel industry, with lasting effects on China’s textile sector. While diversification provided resilience, increased costs and strategic adjustments marked a challenging period for both Chinese exporters and U.S. retailers. The ongoing U.S.-China trade complexities suggest that the textile and apparel industries will continue to navigate these dynamics, likely shaping a more fragmented and resilient global supply chain landscape.
Today, EURATEX (the European Apparel and Textile Confederation) and AMITH (Association Marocaine des Industries du Textile et de l'Habillement)signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) during the 21st Maroc in Mode (MIM 2024) event in Casablanca, aiming to strengthen ties between European and Moroccan textile industries. This agreement seeks to foster collaboration on sustainability, regulatory alignment, and trade competitiveness.
The MoU highlights mutual goals, including promoting sustainable and circular industry practices, improving regulatory frameworks, and enhancing the business environment across both regions. It underscores a joint commitment to advancing competitiveness under the updated Pan Euro Med (PEM) Convention rules, set to take effect on January 1, 2025.
The partnership enables new channels for information sharing on industrial technology, cross-border business initiatives, and joint skill development projects, setting a foundation for a robust and resilient Euro-Mediterranean textile sector.
EURATEX President Mario Jorge Machado emphasized that the collaboration with AMITH aims to bolster the textile sectors in both regions with a focus on sustainability and competitiveness. AMITH President El Ansari Anass noted that the MoU supports AMITH’s mission to drive the Moroccan industry towards greater excellence and sustainability.
This MoU marks a pivotal step towards creating a sustainable, integrated textile ecosystem in the Euro-Mediterranean region, opening fresh opportunities for growth and innovation under the PEM framework.
Zara, the flagship brand of Spanish fashion giant Inditex, is making significant strides in sustainability and innovation, aiming to lessen... Read more
The US textile and apparel industry is undergoing a significant shift in its sourcing strategies, with imports from traditional Asian... Read more
The second edition of the Brands of India apparel trade show, organized by The Clothing Manufacturers Association of India (CMAI),... Read more
While China's economic growth slows, international fashion brands are setting their sights on new Asian markets. India and Japan, with... Read more
The global polyester market is showing signs of strain as exports demand softens. This trend is evident in recent data... Read more
A quiet crisis is brewing behind the gleaming facades of luxury fashion houses. While shoppers clamor for the latest It-bag... Read more
The global fashion industry is bracing for a turbulent 2025, as a cyclical slowdown, rising prices, and shifting consumer preferences... Read more
Economic challenges shape 2025 fashion landscape The global fashion industry enters 2025 facing significant challenges amid economic uncertainty, shifting consumer behaviors,... Read more
Move over athleisure, jeans are back! After a period of sales slump and stiff competition from comfort-focused clothing like athileisure,... Read more
A high-powered roadshow held in Mumbai on November 8, 2024, has ignited excitement for Bharat Tex 2025, India's premier textile... Read more